Richard Fontana has published part two of his article critiquing the output of Project Harmony: "I believe that greater equality among project participants benefits FLOSS by facilitating the growth of vibrant developer and user communities around projects. Harmony’s insistence that the contributor assign copyright or grant a maximally broad copyright license signals that contributors are second-class citizens, undeserving of the same legal power as the project entity."
The trouble with Harmony: Part 2
FOSSBazaar is no longer being updated. The information on this site is preserved for your convenience but may be out of date. Please visit Linux Foundation's Open Compliance Program for current information and activities.
